transport-engineer
Home Advertise Magazine Events Jobs Login
Search     


Your Shout
05/05/2011 (Read full story here or download PDF)    Email to a friend   Comment on this article
With respect to irtec, the vehicle technician licensing scheme, is it time to put our foot back on the ball?

Your ShoutI agree with most of Brian Tinham's views, as expressed in his comment in the February issue of Transport Engineer, and would add that even old hands (like myself) may benefit from refresher courses.

But taking a course does not entitle me to be called a technician. And being able to diagnose a fault using a laptop still requires a skilled individual with a ton of spanners to repair it.

Brian questions why there is a headlong rush towards irtec certification. He believes it is to do with proving competence and I agree. But I also think some workshop managers may have lost trust and confidence in the abilities of their mechanics and technicians.

One of the major reasons for this may well be spurious decisions made by VOSA staff both at annual tests and at roadside checks. It is easy to blame technicians for their apparent failures, but too often it is VOSA at fault, with incorrect and inconsistent approaches.

How can anyone have confidence in VOSA, when the organisation exhibits what might be described as double standards? For example, any power steering oil leak will fail an MOT and yet will not receive even a defect notice on the side of the road.

Similarly, trailers are designed with a 40% brake efficiency and yet need 45% to pass an MOT. And between six and 12% of vehicles fail annual test on headlamp alignment, which is often rectified on the line by the driver. But this is marked as a failure and then passed.

Such examples not only distort the figures and reflect an unreasonable picture of the condition of vehicles used on our roads. They also give no credit to technicians for all the hard work that goes on behind the scenes.

The irtec scheme is important, but so is consistent application of standards used to judge technician competence and vehicle roadworthiness.

 
Author
IRTE
 
 
Download Articles
 
Your_shout.pdf
 
 
This material is protected by SOE copyright 2012.
See Terms and Conditions.
One-off usage is permitted but bulk copying is not.
For multiple copies contact the sales team.
 
Bookmark this article using:
 
Del.icio.us digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon
 
 
Your comments / feedback
Do you have any comments or feedback on this article? Please contact us by filling in the form below.
NameHide name
Your Email Address
Comments
Send
Your comments/feedback may be edited prior to publishing. Not all entries will be published.
Terms and Conditions
Related Companies
Vehicle and Operator Service Agency (VOSA)
 
 
Related News
Type Approval for CBF’s lateral protection system
 
Midlands service centre opens milestone ATF
 
IRTE awards honour talented technicians
 
New ATF centre opens in the south east
 
OCRS and Olympics advice from FTA at the CV Show
 
 
Related Library Articles
The new name of the game is accreditation
 
Every second counts
 
Fare assessment
 
Quality control
 
Best test quest
 
 
Related Products
Blind-side accidents tackled by Volvo technology
 
2011 road transport law guide now available
 
Spring-loaded anti-spill valve technology launched for trucks
 
Snow business
 
Agency drivers and the law for fleet managers
 
 
Related Videos
Soft Docking from Haldex means safety when reversing
 
The "Jiffy" Crew
 
Fresnel truck lens cuts HGV bike accidents.
 
Brigade Electronics is a leading manufacturer of haulage vehicle safety systems.
 
 
Downloads
Your_shout.pdf