REGULATORY
O licences online
DVSA and the traffic commissioners for Great Britain recently published information about the progress of their new digital services for operator licence applicants and licence holders. The new online services have also apparently helped to reduce licence processing times – over the first three months of the digital service, processing times were shorter than the standard nine weeks. There are two proposed additions to the service: incorporating the gov.uk Verify digital identity verification system (pictured), and enabling users to extend the duration of their licence, which is required every five years.
UK air quality plan
In July, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Department for Transport published the UK Air Quality Plan. It sets out how councils with the worst levels of air pollution at busy road junctions and hotspots must take robust action. Local areas will be expected to produce initial plans by April 2018 and final plans by the end of next year. Local authorities will be able to bid for money from a new Clean Air Fund to support improvements that will reduce the need for restrictions on polluting vehicles. This could include changing road layouts, removing traffic lights and speed humps, or upgrading bus fleets.
Central London ULEZ plans may be brought forward
The Mayor of London has proposed introducing the ULEZ (ultra low emission zone) in central London in April 2019 – 16 months earlier than originally planned. The ULEZ will cover the same area as the existing congestion charging zone, and apply 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Vehicles that do not meet Euro 6/VI emission standards must pay a daily charge to drive within the zone.
European mobility: all change!
The European Commission has recently published its European Mobility and Transport Package that will result in important changes to EU law regulating road transport. Proposals include clearer rules on driving and rest times, measures to reduce CO₂ emissions, air pollution and congestion. The Commission is also looking to make changes to allow unlimited cabotage operations within five days of the international delivery. Vehicles under 3.5 tonnes are also likely to be made subject to some EU transport rules.
Direct Vision consultation
To reduce the number of HGV collisions with cyclists and pedestrians, Transport for London proposed the Direct Vision Standard (DVS) last year. Phase one of the consultation closed in April; its results had not been published by mid-September. Further consultations are anticipated in autumn 2017 and spring 2018. Although its impact is not entirely clear, at a stakeholder forum held recently, TfL estimated that current DVS proposals would ban more than half of the N3 off-road HGV chassis by 2020, it was reported. If true, this would have a particular effect on construction trucks.
EMPLOYMENT LAW
Overnight subsistence allowance: guidance on mandatory checks
HMRC requires operators paying drivers the Industry Scale Rate for overnight subsistence allowance (£26.20 with sleeper cab; £34.90 without) to apply for an Approval Notice. In addition, operators must have a random checking system in place to ensure that drivers are actually incurring the expenses that they are claiming. While an operator will need to cross reference work schedules and time sheets, a further check on driver receipts, for example for hotels, food and parking, should be carried out. See also https://is.gd/awuvef to download an RHA factsheet on the issue.
Tribunal fees
In July, the Supreme Court ruled that the Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeals Tribunals Fees Order 2013 has prevented access to justice and is unlawful. The decision follows a legal challenge from trade union Unison, which argued that the level of fees in the Employment Tribunal (reported to be £400–£1,200) compared to those in the Small Claims Court (£80–£455 or more, depending on the claim amount) prevented access to justice for employees. Not only are tribunal applications now free of charge, but also the decision has been applied retroactively: the Supreme Court ordered that fees already paid by claimants should be refunded.
Some say that this judgment is unlikely to mean the end of Employment Tribunal fees and that there is likely to be a consultation soon on a new, lower, fee regime which may even include a transfer of the fee burden from the employee claimant to the employer defendant.